16 04 08 Fed Monkeys

With few exceptions, the Federal Reserve governors have taken the persona of monkeys: speak no evil see no evil hear no evil. Of course the evil here is inflation. And the few who have been brave enough to even raise the topic in their public events are careful to say 'we must be vigilant!' and 'we see it coming down soon!'. We don't have access to LexisNexis to verify but it seems to us that has been the infrequently mentioned party line for over two years.

Yesterday brought a shocking revelation (well, the latest installment): inflation is alive and well. The Labor Dept. released the March PPI (producer price index) data and it was a shocker - so much so that most of the 'major' media outlets picked up the story and fretted over the 1.1% headline increase in the cost of finished goods. The Fed crowd of course were quick to say 'food and energy!' and took solace in the 'core' reading of +0.2%. Lost on both groups?
Intermediate goods: +2.3%, core +1.1%
Crude Goods: +8.0% core +3.5%
Those are month on month changes, not annual.

This morning saw March CPI up 0.3% while core posted a 0.2% gain, matching market expectations. Consumer prices rose 4% on a year-over-year basis, same as Feb. Core CPI grew 2.4% on an annual basis. Once again, there are those who are pointing to this release as indicating 'inflation is well contained'. Of note, 6 month treasury bills are yielding 1.45%, 2 year notes are 1.85% and 5 year 2.69%. Only 30 year paper trades over the annual inflation rate (based on y/y CPI) at 4.45%.

We ask: How long before the intermediate and crude components of PPI are passed through into CPI? Asked another way, for how long can companies absorb these increases in inputs (by productivity gains we are told) before their margins begin to erode and consequently, earnings?

It was nice to see that former Reaganite Martin Feldstein wrote yesterday in the WSJ that it was time for the Fed to stop cutting rates or risk further fueling commodity inflation while not helping (and probably hurting) the underlying US economy. We here at Rant Street have been saying this for a few years now but better late than never that someone with clout catches on.


  
Remember personal info?

Emoticons / Textile

Comment moderation is enabled on this site. This means that your comment will not be visible on this site until it has been approved by an editor.

This is to prevent automated spam. Please type your answer all in CAPS
 

  (Register your username / Log in)

Notify:
Hide email:

Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.



Copyright 2004-2008 by Gedanken Experiment (previously Rant Street) except as otherwise noted. Our terms of use are as follows: Content on Gedanken Experiment may not be indexed, cached, reproduced or syndicated in any manner by any party whose purpose is to provide such an index, cache, reproduction or syndication of our content for a monetary fee or other consideration to their clients, customers or users. Content on Gedanken Experiment may not be copied, reproduced, republished, indexed, cached, uploaded, posted , transmitted, framed or distributed in any way, without the prior written permission of Gedanken Experiment, except that a) user may download, display, or print one copy of the materials on any single computer solely for user's use; b) user may briefly quote or excerpt for use in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment or as part of a news report as per fair use guidelines of www.copyright.gov; c) internet search engines which provide the public the ability to search online content at no charge (free) may index and cache content from Gedanken Experiment which is not explicitly blocked by robots.txt; in case (a), (b) and (c) above user agrees to keep intact all copyright, trademark, and other proprietary notices of both Gedanken Experiment and any other third parties mentioned in our content. Modification of the materials or use of the materials for any other purpose is a violation of Gedanken Experiment's, its affiliates', or its third-party information providers' copyrights and other proprietary rights. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any license or right under any copyright, patent, trademark, or other proprietary interest of Gedanken Experiment, its affiliates, or any third party, except as expressly set forth herein. 02-13-2007